Wednesday, September 1, 2010
The Myth of Wage Inequality.
Washington State voters are going to vote on I-1098 to decide whether the state gets to tax our income.
The statistic keeps popping up that the top 20% of wage earners earn 9, 10 or 11 times as much as the bottom 20% of wage earners.* Governor Christine Gregoire and her buddy Bill Gates Sr. would have us believe this requires a state income tax to set straight.
What we have to pretend is that if someone finds himself in the bottom 20% of wage earners, he's stuck. There is nothing he can do to get increased income. This assumption is bogus.
The most important thing you can do to increase your income is get older. The bottom 20% of earners is overwhelmingly inhabited by young people. A special example of a young person getting a lower annual wage is the college student who works only in the Summer.
Generally, the young wage earner is most likely the newest person on the job. That makes him or her least experienced and least productive. As people gain experience, they also gain income, unless they decide to stay with perpetually low income jobs by frequent quitting.
As a worker ages, he or she gains experience and stability. Both of these qualities makes the worker more desirable and productive. The employer will pay more to retain the better worker.
Compare age versus income, 2008 **
There is no such thing as an income tax on the rich in America. Riches are always property, not income. There is only a tax on better workers, better producers. The drop in average income after age 65 is presumably based on the effect of retirement form the work force. By the age of 65, you hope to be rich enough to be able to pay for the remaining years of your life.
In order to justify "progressive" income taxes, the politician must pretend to be interested in social justice or similar lies. In fact, politicians are greedy to take more of the peoples' money.
More taxes means less sales, less sales means fewer jobs, fewer jobs means no recovery anytime soon.
~~~~~~~~
* The precise multiplier is dependent on whether the statistician compared pre-tax wages or post tax wages. You see, politicians love to find new excuses to raise taxes so they can take more of the peoples' money for themselves.
** table based on ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/ce/standard/2008/age.txt
The statistic keeps popping up that the top 20% of wage earners earn 9, 10 or 11 times as much as the bottom 20% of wage earners.* Governor Christine Gregoire and her buddy Bill Gates Sr. would have us believe this requires a state income tax to set straight.
What we have to pretend is that if someone finds himself in the bottom 20% of wage earners, he's stuck. There is nothing he can do to get increased income. This assumption is bogus.
The most important thing you can do to increase your income is get older. The bottom 20% of earners is overwhelmingly inhabited by young people. A special example of a young person getting a lower annual wage is the college student who works only in the Summer.
Generally, the young wage earner is most likely the newest person on the job. That makes him or her least experienced and least productive. As people gain experience, they also gain income, unless they decide to stay with perpetually low income jobs by frequent quitting.
As a worker ages, he or she gains experience and stability. Both of these qualities makes the worker more desirable and productive. The employer will pay more to retain the better worker.
Compare age versus income, 2008 **
There is no such thing as an income tax on the rich in America. Riches are always property, not income. There is only a tax on better workers, better producers. The drop in average income after age 65 is presumably based on the effect of retirement form the work force. By the age of 65, you hope to be rich enough to be able to pay for the remaining years of your life.
In order to justify "progressive" income taxes, the politician must pretend to be interested in social justice or similar lies. In fact, politicians are greedy to take more of the peoples' money.
More taxes means less sales, less sales means fewer jobs, fewer jobs means no recovery anytime soon.
~~~~~~~~
* The precise multiplier is dependent on whether the statistician compared pre-tax wages or post tax wages. You see, politicians love to find new excuses to raise taxes so they can take more of the peoples' money for themselves.
** table based on ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/ce/standard/2008/age.txt
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What other people read on this blog
-
Would Dave Reichert going to force Washington to abandon abortion? Reichert says that, as governor, he will enforce the law, even if he pers...
-
The Seattle Times reports a "Surge in electricity demand spells trouble for PNW. & forecasts show t he challenges facing the Nor...
-
Washington Initiative 2109, Repeal Capital Gains Tax Initiative - click here to download the text in pdf We need to limit government overre...
-
This year, anti-gun Washington Legislators continued their crusade of undermining the Second Amendment and defying the precedent establish...
-
They call SB 6069 an improvement for retirement security. It has no opt-out provision, so you must pay a percentage of your paycheck into ...
Effing the ineffable - Washington State elections sometimes have been rigged.
“It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”
-- Joseph Stalin
No comments:
Post a Comment