The Seattle Education Association recently
threatened a strike after getting a 10.5 percent pay raise last year. The Kennewick teachers union, likewise, has
disrupted the start of school for children with its pay demands. Meanwhile, teachers in Toutle Lake School District have
blocked the state’s “paramount duty” to education children because of their pay demands this year despite a 17 percent raise last year.
Teachers are also threatening a strike against the families of
Ellensburg and
LaCenter.
What do they want? How does it impact other services the districts
provide? What other tradeoffs are offered at the bargaining table?
Individuals, families, taxpayers, other district employees and even
union members commonly do not know given the absurd custom of making
these critical budget-busting decisions in behind closed doors.
But bargaining reaches beyond just salaries and budget priorities.
The Seattle Education Association has previously negotiated in favor
of more than 100 individuals receiving a $2,500 stipend to be part of
some schools’ “Racial Equity Teams.” Other districts negotiate away the
ability of the district to get community volunteer help with projects or
activities.
Some negotiate to add hurdles to parent visits to their children’s classrooms.
Any school board could enlist the public to help consider the full
ramifications of unreasonable bargaining table demands by adopting a
transparency policy to allow the observation, livestreaming or immediate
document disclosure of proceedings.
In the Pullman School District, WEA and board representatives have
negotiated their teachers’ union contract in the open, and the sky didn’t fall.
In Oregon, where observed bargaining is the law, the school
directors’ association representative reports that openness starts
bargaining closer to compromise since extremes and stalling tactics are
harder to explain to the public.
Further, the union tactic of deceiving the public about the elements
of dispute and vilifying a district leadership team are removed by
adding transparency – any bad actors on the management team are on
display, but so are misstatements by the union.
The Washington Education Association has made opposition to a
transparency policy a litmus test for its support of school board
candidates. In this election cycle, half of the school board positions
in the state are up for election.
Among the
questions to ask school board candidates is what they think about permitting observed or livestreamed bargaining.
Source for this article is the Freedom Foundation