Initiative Measure No. 517 concerns initiative and referendum measures. If enacted I-517 would have three related results.
First, I-517 would make it illegal to interfere or retaliate against signature-gatherers and/or petition-signers. There have been cases recently where thugs have intimidated petitioners. Second, it will require that all measures receiving sufficient signatures appear on the ballot. This is primarily to prevent the use of the courts to rule the people cannot vote. Lastly, petition drives would have more time to gather initiative petition signatures.
I-517 safeguards the petition process. Thus it will help to promote a healthy democracy in Washington State. Impolite recommends you vote Yes on I-517.
Initiative Measure No. 522: "Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Engineered Food" measure. 522 started out as an initiative to the legislature, calling on the legislature to enact some new content regulations for food labeling. The legislature referred the matter back to the people so we get to vote.
Everybody wants to know what they are eating, naturally. Reasonable requirements for food labeling can include a list of modified ingredients. But many people are frightened they are eating unhealthy, totally artificial food. Fear is the mind killer. People should eat more right to be healthy.
You are not a carrot or a corn plant - those are genetically different from most voters. Why don't people think about the fact that when they eat something, it is a totally different genetically? Your digestive system is designed to break down products of foreign genetics into stuff your body can use.
~~~~~~~~
"Taking a purely empirical view, labeling of genetically modified organisms provides little useful consumer health or safety information. GE products currently in the marketplace have proven safe in foods and animal feeds through use and testing. Environmentally, these products can have a good record of improvement over conventional production methods while maintaining the high yields and profits necessary for farmers. These facts have been repeatedly demonstrated in the peer reviewed scientific literature... ." Source
~~~~~~~~
Nonetheless, the I-522 campaign is cheap politics.
An ad for 522 claims initiatives opponents are supported by dark and sinister corporations, therefore they are lying. The I-522 campaign says there will be no increase in cost. The state says the cost of I-522 will be "non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings" according to the Office of Fiscal Management's fiscal note. Even though the cost is unknown, that is not the same as no cost at all. The I-522 campaign is lying
The I-522 tells you I-522 opponents are supported by 'corporations' (cue spooky music). The I-522 campaign won't tell you they get most of their support from "organic" foods corporations. Organic foods companies to sell unprocessed or less-processed foods, unpasteurized milk products, and soybean curd. Organic food is a huge profit maker.
I-522 labeling requirement are focused at processed foods. You can see this is mainly a way for the "organic" foods people to lash out at processed foods companies -- so the "organic" corporations can grab more profit. Most of the money for 522 is coming in from out of state.
~~~~~~~~
I-522 is half-baked. Too bad the legislature didn't do their jobs and write some sensible law when they had the chance (Maybe that is too much to hope). Impolite recommends a no vote on I-522.
Eat your vegetables. Watch your weight. Be healthy.
Advisory Votes
Advisory votes are non-binding. The results will not change the law. These makes the matter seem trivial to most people so it drops off the radar. Despite the fact that the vote is advisory, it is important to be informed about the legislature's activities.
There are five new tax questions:
SSB 5444, titled AN ACT Relating to administration of taxes regarding publicly owned property, was passed by the House of Representatives. The Office of Financial Management has identified this bill as requiring a ten-year projection of increased cost to the taxpayers or affected feepayers.
Ten-year projection:
Fiscal
Year |
Leasehold
Excise Tax
|
|
2014
|
$ 145,000
|
|
2015
|
167,000
|
|
2016
|
175,000
|
|
2017
|
183,000
|
|
2018
|
194,000
|
|
2019
|
202,000
|
|
2020
|
210,000
|
|
2021
|
218,000
|
|
2022
|
227,000
|
|
2023
|
235,000
|
|
Total:
|
$ 1,956,000
|
~~~~~~~~
SB 5627, titled AN ACT Relating to the taxation of commuter air carriers, has been passed by the House of Representatives. The Office of Financial Management has identified this bill as requiring a ten-year projection of increased cost to the taxpayers or affected feepayers.
Ten-year projection:
Fiscal
Year |
Aircraft Excise Tax
|
|
2014
|
$ 35,000
|
|
2015
|
35,000
|
|
2016
|
38,000
|
|
2017
|
38,000
|
|
2018
|
41,000
|
|
2019
|
41,000
|
|
2020
|
44,000
|
|
2021
|
44,000
|
|
2022
|
47,000
|
|
2023
|
47,000
|
|
Total:
|
$ 410,000
|
~~~~~~~~
The House of Representatives has concurred with ESHB 1846 AMS WM S2534.1 as amended by the Senate, titled AN ACT Relating to stand-alone dental coverage, and has passed the bill final passage. The Office of Financial Management has identified this bill as requiring a ten-year projection of increased cost to the taxpayers or affected feepayers.
Ten-year projection:
Ten-year projection:
Fiscal
Year |
Retail Sales Tax
|
|
2014
|
$ 36,258,000
|
|
2015
|
12,875,000
|
|
2016
|
43,470,000
|
|
2017
|
43,470,000
|
|
2018
|
43,470,000
|
|
2019
|
43,470,000
|
|
2020
|
43,470,000
|
|
2021
|
43,470,000
|
|
2022
|
43,470,000
|
|
2023
|
43,470,000
|
|
Total:
|
$ 396,893,000
|
EHB 2075, titled AN ACT Relating to preserving funding deposited into the education legacy trust account used to support common schools and access to higher education by restoring the application of the Washington estate and transfer tax to certain property transfers while modifying the estate and transfer tax to provide tax relief for certain estates, has been passed by the Senate in the 2013 2nd Special Session. The Office of Financial Management has identified this bill as requiring a ten-year projection of increased cost to the taxpayers or affected feepayers.
Ten-year projection:
Fiscal
Year |
Estate Tax
|
|
2014
|
$ 109,700,000
|
|
2015
|
39,300,000
|
|
2016
|
39,300,000
|
|
2017
|
35,300,000
|
|
2018
|
34,400,000
|
|
2019
|
40,000,000
|
|
2020
|
42,300,000
|
|
2021
|
44,300,000
|
|
2022
|
46,100,000
|
|
2023
|
47,700,000
|
|
Total:
|
$ 478,400,000
|
~~~~~~~~
That's a total of $877,659,000 in new taxes.
You can verify this information at the ballot info listserve
Election results will be posted here after the election.
No comments:
Post a Comment