Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission has been enormously successful in
ministering to the city’s homeless population. Two years after program
completion, 70 percent of Mission clients are working or going to school
full time. Yet the Mission’s employees will freely say that success is
just a byproduct of their most important priority: bringing others into
relationship with Jesus Christ. It is that focus which makes the Mission so spectacularly successful.
It
works. Mission workers serve over 1,000 of their homeless neighbors
each day. And, again, of the many hurting people who take part in the
Mission’s programs each year, about 70 percent are on the right track
and either working or in school. It would be difficult to find another
organization making such a positive impact in such a difficult area. And
in a city where nearly 12,000 homeless individuals crowd the streets every night, that kind of success is vital not only to the lives of those on the streets, but to the well-being of the city itself.
Of course, a philosophy only works if everyone involved buys into it,
which is why the Mission requires all full-time employees to share and
live out their Christian religious beliefs, be actively involved in a
local church, and be willing and able to share the Gospel with those
whom they serve.
In 2016, though, a former volunteer decided to apply for a full-time
position with the Mission’s legal-aid clinic — despite the fact that he
did not agree with the Mission’s religious beliefs or follow its
religious-lifestyle requirements. In fact, he wanted to change the
Mission’s beliefs and dismiss the very faith that has spurred its
remarkable success.
Understandably, the Mission turned down his application. The
applicant opted to take the Mission to court, hoping to find a judge who
would punish the organization for declining to hire him. He struck gold
at the Washington Supreme Court, where all nine justices ruled in his
favor, despite the legislature’s exclusion of religious nonprofits from
state employment law.
In doing so, the state’s highest court effectively torpedoed a
religious freedom that the federal government and nearly every other
state protects: the ability of religious organizations to hire those who
share and live out the organization’s beliefs. This ruling puts the
Mission to an untenable choice: hire someone who has stated his intent
to change the organization’s beliefs or shut its doors to the homeless
neighbors who rely on the Mission for help.
This ruling is unconstitutional. Which is why the Mission has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case.
The Mission — like the thousands of vulnerable individuals that it
serves — depends on the nation’s highest court upholding the right of
religious organizations to build and sustain organizations of believers
who share the same faith.
(John Bursch - National Review, edited)