Monday, January 29, 2018
Gun Control Washington follow up
Substitute Senate Bill 5444,
sponsored by Senator David Frockt (D-46), is a stepping stone to a
larger prohibition. As drafted, anyone under the age of 21 would be
virtually unable to possess commonly owned semi-automatic rifles. This
legislation attempts to brand these firearms as “assault weapons” to
drum up unfounded fear of their ownership. The proposed substitute
would treat these so-called "assault weapons" like handguns under state
law, which require a waiting period of either 10 days or until all
federal and state background checks have been completed. Individuals
would be required to complete the same purchase application as for
handguns. The Washington Department of Licensing would be granted
permission to store this information under SB 5444, creating a back-door
registry. Scheduled for a committee vote on Thursday, February 1st at 10:00am.
Substitute Senate Bill 5441,
sponsored by Senator Patty Kuderer (D-48), would impose a 6-month
firearm prohibition for any person who has been released from a 72-hour
mental health evaluation. Current law allows a person to be held for a
limited time in order for a mental health professional to determine if
the individual, based on allegations of a mental health or substance
abuse disorder, is in need of treatment or further commitment. At the
end of the evaluation, individuals that are not in need of treatment are
released. SB 5441 would nonetheless apply a blanket prohibition of
firearm possession to all released individuals, and requires the
immediate surrender of all firearms and any concealed pistol license to
law enforcement. This legislation removes a constitutional right
without any mental health adjudication or judicial determination, and
without any due process of law. Scheduled for a committee vote on
Thursday, February 1st at 10:00am.
Senate Bill 6298,
sponsored by Senator Manka Dhingra (D-45), would expand the list of
domestic violence offenses that prohibit firearm possession to also
include “Harrassment.” Domestic violence is a serious issue and those
convicted of violent offenses should be addressed accordingly. However,
the definition of harassment under Washington state law is so broadly
defined that it includes 37 other crimes, many of which involve no form
of actual contact or threat of harm to a person. Under this
legislation, even the offenses of graffiti and trespass fall within this
umbrella category that could result in a firearm prohibition. Imposing
an automatic, blanket ban on constitutional rights for these wildly
varying offenses is excessive and unwarranted. Scheduled for a
committee vote on Tuesday, January 30th at 10:00am.
Senate Bill 6415,
sponsored by Senator Sam Hunt (D-22), would require individuals to ask
for express consent to conceal carry a firearm at the residence of
another person. Failure to obtain permission prior to entering the
property would result in a misdemeanor crime. Individuals convicted of
this new offense would be required to surrender their concealed pistol
license, and would be prohibited from obtaining a CPL for five years.
This vaguely drafted legislation targets Washington’s law abiding CPL
holders, and as drafted, could even make it a crime for law enforcement
to enter one’s property without first requesting permission to carry
their firearm. This bill is scheduled for a public hearing in the Senate Law & Justice Committee at 10:00am on Tuesday, January 30th, and a committee vote on Thursday, February 1st at 10:00am.
Senate Bill 5992,
passed by a Senate vote of 29-20. Sponsored by Senator Kevin Van de
Wege (D-24), SB 5992 was originally introduced as a trigger modification
device ban with broad, overreaching language that would have
criminalized modifications commonly made to firearms by law-abiding
citizens. Instead, the legislation was amended on the floor Thursday
night to narrow down the definition of the ban to apply only to
bump-fire stock attachments. This bill will now head to the House where
it will be assigned to committee for further consideration.
Friday, January 26, 2018
Greed house gas tax
The Washington State legislature is proposing a $7.4 billion Carbon Pollution Tax, SB 6203 - 2017-18.
The tax will be added to the price you pay for gasoline and electricity. Washington State already has the second highest gasoline taxes in the country. Gasoline taxes will increase 18¢ per gallon. Inlsee and the legislature don't seem to think greenhouse gas taxes are high enough
If you use natural gas to heat your home, you will be taxed more for that.
Industry that uses natural gas, like the beer brewing industry, will have to add the tax to the price of their product. This carbon tax will be tough on Seattle's micro-brewers.
The Senate bill report reviews the implications of this measure, and reflects how current law handles the existing situation (Yes, Virginia, we already have law to protect the environment against pollution).
Its apparent the purpose of the proposed carbon tax is to suck more money out of the the people of Washington State. Climate change is a tax issue. It is not scientific fact. Greed lives in Olympia.
![]() |
| 2016 tax rate. |
If you use natural gas to heat your home, you will be taxed more for that.
Industry that uses natural gas, like the beer brewing industry, will have to add the tax to the price of their product. This carbon tax will be tough on Seattle's micro-brewers.
The Senate bill report reviews the implications of this measure, and reflects how current law handles the existing situation (Yes, Virginia, we already have law to protect the environment against pollution).
Its apparent the purpose of the proposed carbon tax is to suck more money out of the the people of Washington State. Climate change is a tax issue. It is not scientific fact. Greed lives in Olympia.
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Socialized medicine proposition
Senate Bill 5747 proposes health care financing be controlled by the state. If this Obamacare type insurance scam is enacted, it pretty much means Washington State will have the highest taxes in the US. and poorest medical care. A lot of the language is similar to Obamacare, such as "[SB5747 will] generate savings sufficient to ensure coverage for all Washington residents." Not likely.
Anyway, there will be a hearing on 01/18/2018 at 10:00AM, at the J.A. Cherberg Building, Senate Hearing Rm 2, Olympia, WA. The notice for this hearing was time stamped Wednesday, January 17, 2018 4:18 PM. Such short notice makes it pretty clear the legislature thinks this such a bad idea, they had to rush to ram it down our throats.
Anyway, there will be a hearing on 01/18/2018 at 10:00AM, at the J.A. Cherberg Building, Senate Hearing Rm 2, Olympia, WA. The notice for this hearing was time stamped Wednesday, January 17, 2018 4:18 PM. Such short notice makes it pretty clear the legislature thinks this such a bad idea, they had to rush to ram it down our throats.
Monday, January 15, 2018
Civilian gun restriction plans in Washington State
The committee agenda has not yet been posted for which bills will be heard; however, anti-gun legislators have already made it clear they are going to push several sweeping gun control bills this year.
- Senate Bill 5050, sponsored by Senator David Frockt (D-46), and House Bill 1134, sponsored by Representative Strom Peterson (D-21), would prohibit all possession, purchase, sale or transfer of commonly owned semi-automatic rifles and ammunition magazines holding ten or more rounds.
- Senate Bill 5444, sponsored by Senator Frockt, and House Bill 1387, sponsored by Representative Laurie Jinkins (D-27), would impose a registration-licensing system for commonly owned semi-automatic rifles and ammunition magazines holding ten or more rounds. Among the idiocies, Section 1. (27)(vi) restricts marine flare guns "assault weapons."
- Senate Bill 5463, sponsored by Senator Frockt, and House Bill 1122, sponsored by Representative Ruth Kagi (D-32), would require individuals to lock up firearms or potentially face Class C Felony charges [All of Section 2, especially (2)(a)]. This intrusive government legislation invades people’s homes and forces them to render their firearms useless in a self-defense situation by locking them up.
Update: Next Thursday, January 18th, House Bill 1122 is scheduled for a vote in the House Judiciary Committee. Please contact members of the House Judiciary Committee and urge them to oppose this bill! Comment on the bill to voice your opposition.
Suitable storage of firearms varies by personal circumstances as different gun owners have different requirements and it is unreasonable for the law to attempt to impose a one-size-fits-all solution.
Senate Bill 5463, the companion bill of HB 1122, has been scheduled for a public hearing in the Senate Law and Justice Committee on Monday, January 15th at 10:00AM.
- Senate Bill 5992, sponsored by Senator Kevin Van De Wege (D-24), would make it a crime to knowingly possess a firearm accessory or any other device, part or combination of parts that is designed or functions to accelerate the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm.
Update: Trigger Modification Ban Passed Committee
Earlier today, the Washington state Senate Law & Justice Committee passed Senate Bill 5992 out of committee with a 4-3 vote. As drafted, this legislation has overreaching language that would ban modifications commonly made to firearms by law-abiding citizens (post your comment here). This bill is expected to be on the Senate floor as soon as Thursday. Please contact your Senator and urge them to OPPOSE this legislation.
Senate Bill 5992, sponsored by Senator Kevin Van De Wege (D-24), mirrors federal legislation proposed by anti-gun California U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). This bill would make it a crime to knowingly possess a firearm accessory or any other device, part or combination of parts that is designed or functions to accelerate the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm. The broad and overreaching provisions in SB 5992 could potentially criminalize firearm modifications such as competition triggers, muzzle brakes, and ergonomic changes that are commonly done by law-abiding gun owners to make their firearms more suitable for self-defense, competition, hunting, or even overcoming disability.
- Senate Bill 6049, sponsored by Senator Frockt, would prohibit the possession of ammunition magazines holding ten or more rounds, with limited exceptions.
~~~~~~~~
We the People can claim our constitutional defense against these proposals, but that won't stop the Democratic Party from choosing to support their criminal constituents over innocent people. Witness what happened in California to Kate Steinle.
~~~~~~~~
Washington State Constitution, Article 1, Section 24: RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.
"The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men." [A citizen has the right to be armed, but not to form a private army].
United State Constitution, Amendment 2:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Friday, January 12, 2018
Children or guns?
People are interested in good society, not murdering each other. Don't be puzzled that more guns in law-abiding, civilian hands results in less crime.
The choice the leftist controlled media would have us believe is 'children or guns.'
The media can sound so self-righteous when they insist the free person is too free and must be controlled to save children's lives. But that has never been the choice.
It is the right of life to have means of self-preservation. By far most people have a weapon for self-defense, against a day they hope will never come.
The choice the leftist controlled media would have us believe is 'children or guns.'
The media can sound so self-righteous when they insist the free person is too free and must be controlled to save children's lives. But that has never been the choice.
It is the right of life to have means of self-preservation. By far most people have a weapon for self-defense, against a day they hope will never come.
Thursday, December 7, 2017
Attorney General Bob Ferguson calls for Gun Bans
Attorney General Bob Ferguson authored a couple of unfair gun ban & seizure bills which are currently under consideration in the Washington State legislature. The bills are also probably unconstitutional: "Article 1, Section 24:Right to Bear Arms. "The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of
himself, or the state, shall not be impaired [its a private right], but nothing in this
section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to
organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men [no private armies]."
Gun control is a stagnant idea. Guns are not the problem; guns are neutral tools. Criminal behavior is the problem. Gary Kleck demonstrated that an American uses a firearm in self defense, on average, every thirteen seconds. This does not ennoble a firearm. It only re-demonstrates that guns are not the problem.
~~~~~~~~
Senate Bill 5050 would prohibit all possession, purchase, sale or transfer of commonly owned semi-automatic rifles and ammunition magazines holding ten or more rounds, and House Bill 1387, which would impose a registration-licensing system for these so-called “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”
In the United States, firearms registration has always preceded seizure: The New York example; and the California example.
~~~~~~~~
The following reasoning is clear and accurate:
“If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns, because the guns will be needed to disarm people. So it’s not that you are anti-gun. You’ll need the police’s guns to take away other people’s guns. So you’re very pro-gun; you just believe that only the Government (which is, of course, so reliable, honest, moral and virtuous…) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun control. There is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small political elite and their minions.”
-- Stefan Molyneux
Gun control is a stagnant idea. Guns are not the problem; guns are neutral tools. Criminal behavior is the problem. Gary Kleck demonstrated that an American uses a firearm in self defense, on average, every thirteen seconds. This does not ennoble a firearm. It only re-demonstrates that guns are not the problem.
~~~~~~~~
Senate Bill 5050 would prohibit all possession, purchase, sale or transfer of commonly owned semi-automatic rifles and ammunition magazines holding ten or more rounds, and House Bill 1387, which would impose a registration-licensing system for these so-called “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”
In the United States, firearms registration has always preceded seizure: The New York example; and the California example.
~~~~~~~~
The following reasoning is clear and accurate:
“If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns, because the guns will be needed to disarm people. So it’s not that you are anti-gun. You’ll need the police’s guns to take away other people’s guns. So you’re very pro-gun; you just believe that only the Government (which is, of course, so reliable, honest, moral and virtuous…) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun control. There is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small political elite and their minions.”
-- Stefan Molyneux
Sunday, September 17, 2017
Seattle City Clowncil -- Fool Speed Ahead!
There has been no shortage of big news in Seattle this past week.
Between (1) Amazon's bombshell announcement they were setting up a new headquarters, and (2) Mayor Ed Murray resigning in scandal, city government has been rocked to its core.
At least, it should be rocked to its core. Instead, you saw council members signal that they just don't get it.
Some lambasted Amazon for daring to expand elsewhere, and called for new taxes on successful Seattle businesses. It all sends a signal to other businesses: Look elsewhere.
This is a council determined to stay the stupid course and impose ever-more taxes, fees, and rules on the businesses that have helped make Seattle vibrant and wealthy. Seattle city government is more likely to view thriving businesses as leeches than contributing employers.
The city budget has grown rapidly yet city government is a mess, and the obvious anti-business stance of the city council is clearly creating economic downsides.
Time for a course correction? No, they say, full speed ahead.
-Rob McKenna
At least, it should be rocked to its core. Instead, you saw council members signal that they just don't get it.
Some lambasted Amazon for daring to expand elsewhere, and called for new taxes on successful Seattle businesses. It all sends a signal to other businesses: Look elsewhere.
This is a council determined to stay the stupid course and impose ever-more taxes, fees, and rules on the businesses that have helped make Seattle vibrant and wealthy. Seattle city government is more likely to view thriving businesses as leeches than contributing employers.
The city budget has grown rapidly yet city government is a mess, and the obvious anti-business stance of the city council is clearly creating economic downsides.
Time for a course correction? No, they say, full speed ahead.
-Rob McKenna
Friday, August 11, 2017
Resistance to Seattle council income tax
Freedom
Foundation attorneys joined with the Seattle law firm of Lane, Powell,
PC – the region’s most respected tax law specialists – to file a lawsuit
on behalf of 19 Seattle residents that would kill the new income tax before it
takes effect and spreads to other parts of the state and other income classes.
The tax measure, which requires residents to pay a 2.25 percent tax if they are a single filer and make more than $250,000 annually or file jointly and make more than $500,000, is a clear violation of the state constitution’s equal protection language because it holds Washingtonians to different standards based on their income level.
It also violates state law, the Seattle city charter, 100 years of legal precedent and the will of the voters as expressed at least 10 times over the years.
“This is clearly bad policy and illegal, but it’s also an assault on the rule of law,” David Dewhirst, Freedom Foundation litigation counsel, told Fox News. “If they can get away with it this time, where does it stop?”
~~~~~~~~
Among those covering the story:
National TV
Story and links provided by the Freedom Foundation
The tax measure, which requires residents to pay a 2.25 percent tax if they are a single filer and make more than $250,000 annually or file jointly and make more than $500,000, is a clear violation of the state constitution’s equal protection language because it holds Washingtonians to different standards based on their income level.
It also violates state law, the Seattle city charter, 100 years of legal precedent and the will of the voters as expressed at least 10 times over the years.
“This is clearly bad policy and illegal, but it’s also an assault on the rule of law,” David Dewhirst, Freedom Foundation litigation counsel, told Fox News. “If they can get away with it this time, where does it stop?”
~~~~~~~~
Among those covering the story:
National TV
- Fox & Friends (FOX News): Freedom Foundation Lawsuit Against Seattle’s Income Tax
- Varney & Co (FOX Business): Freedom Foundation’s Lawsuit Against Seattle’s Income Tax
- Varney & Co (FOX Business): Freedom Foundation’s Lawsuit Against Seattle’s Income Tax
- Mornings With Maria Bartiromo (FOX Business): Freedom Foundation’s Lawsuit Against Seattle’s Income Tax
- FBN AM (FOX Business): "Two groups" suing Seattle
- Kennedy (Fox Business): Freedom Foundation Lawsuit Over Seattle's Tax On The Rich
- Trish Regan (Fox Business): Freedom Foundation Lawsuit Over Seattle Income Tax
- KOMO 4 (ABC): Freedom Foundation’s Lawsuit Against Seattle’s Income Tax
- KIRO 7 (CBS): Freedom Foundation, Opportunity For All File Lawsuits
- KIRO 7 (CBS): Freedom Foundation, Opportunity For All File Lawsuits
- KING 5 (NBC): Freedom Foundation’s Lawsuit Against Seattle’s Income Tax
- Fox News: EXCLUSIVE: Freedom Foundation Sues Seattle Over Controversial New Income Tax
- Wall Street Journal: Lawsuit Says Seattle’s ‘Tax-The-Rich’ Measure Violates State Constitution
- Washington Examiner: Seattle Sued Over Controversial Income Tax On The Wealthy
- Red State: Seattle Adopts Illegal Income Tax: Freedom Foundation Files Suit To Stop It
- Fox Nation (Red State): Seattle Adopts Illegal Income Tax: Freedom Foundation Files Suit To Stop It
- Fox Business (WSJ): Lawsuit Says Seattle’s ‘Tax-The-Rich’ Measure Violates State Constitution
- The Blaze: Freedom Foundation Sues Seattle Over Tax Targeting The ‘Rich’
- PJ Media: Seattle Sued Over ‘Tax The Rich’ Law
- Newsmax: WSJ: Seattle’s ‘Tax-The-Rich’ Measure Spurs Freedom Foundation Lawsuit
- Politico (Morning Tax): See You In Court
- Reason: Lawsuit Says Seattle's Income Tax Illegal, Unconstitutional
- Vanity Fair: Wealthy Seattleites Are Having None Of This Income Tax Crap
- Associated Press: 3 Suits Filed Against Seattle Target Income Tax On Wealthy
- KOMO: Freedom Foundation Files Lawsuit Against Seattle’s High-Income Tax
- Seattle Times: Two More Suits Filed To Block Seattle’s New Income Tax
- Seattle PI: ‘Illegal For Many Reasons’: Group Sues Seattle Over Income Tax
- Seattle Weekly: Fremont ‘Baroness,’ Shoe Designer, Microsoft Exec Sue Over Income Tax
- My Northwest: Seattle Hit With More Lawsuits Over Income Tax
- KPLU-FM: 4:30 p.m., 5 a.m., 7 a.m.
- KOMO-AM: 2 p.m., 4:30 p.m., 6:30 p.m., 7 p.m., 9 p.m.
- KUOW-AM: 5:30 p.m., 5 a.m., 7 a.m., 11 a.m.
- KNKX-FM: 4:30 p.m., 5:30 a.m., 7 a.m.
- Fox News: Seattle Tax Hike: Think Tank Fights Back With Lawsuit
- Fox & Friends (FOX News): Freedom Foundation Lawsuit Against Seattle’s Income Tax
Story and links provided by the Freedom Foundation
Monday, July 10, 2017
Inslee gets petty
If you ask a Democratic insider in Olympia (off the record, of
course)
how influential Gov. Jay Inslee is in his party's legislative caucuses,
you're bound to learn a lot. Legislators just concluded a bruising
budget
negotiation, but "the fingerprints of Inslee's December budget proposal
are scarcely to be found" in the final product, I point out on the SmarterGovernmentWashington website.
His fingerprints are smeared all over a very public veto he made yesterday of a bipartisan agreement to extend the B&O tax rates that Boeing receives to other manufacturers. These lower rates were "paid for" by ending other tax incentives, and are key to the final budget deal. Inslee vetoed the provision anyway, then gave a needlessly inartful, lecturing answer about it at a press conference.
What if legislators are upset about his veto, he was asked. "I can't control their tender feelings," he retorted. There were plenty of other such lines, but his fit of pique mostly revealed the weak hand he plays from in the state capitol (he is, he has insisted, "a player on the field").
Sen. Michael Baumgartner (R-Spokane) tweeted out, "There will 100% NOT be a Capital budget unless House helps overide Veto. Deal is a deal. 88 yes votes."
Rep. Drew Stokesbary (R-Auburn) wrote, "Reneging on difficult deal in which all sides gave up something is going to have profound consequences on future #waleg budgets negotiations." Turns out the other players on the field have moves to make, too.
-Rob McKenna
His fingerprints are smeared all over a very public veto he made yesterday of a bipartisan agreement to extend the B&O tax rates that Boeing receives to other manufacturers. These lower rates were "paid for" by ending other tax incentives, and are key to the final budget deal. Inslee vetoed the provision anyway, then gave a needlessly inartful, lecturing answer about it at a press conference.
What if legislators are upset about his veto, he was asked. "I can't control their tender feelings," he retorted. There were plenty of other such lines, but his fit of pique mostly revealed the weak hand he plays from in the state capitol (he is, he has insisted, "a player on the field").
Sen. Michael Baumgartner (R-Spokane) tweeted out, "There will 100% NOT be a Capital budget unless House helps overide Veto. Deal is a deal. 88 yes votes."
Rep. Drew Stokesbary (R-Auburn) wrote, "Reneging on difficult deal in which all sides gave up something is going to have profound consequences on future #waleg budgets negotiations." Turns out the other players on the field have moves to make, too.
-Rob McKenna
Friday, June 23, 2017
Special session update, revenue forecast released
The Legislature has concluded its second
special session. There is still no agreement on an operating budget or
an education funding plan. However, negotiators are very close.
I understand there is some concerns about
a government shutdown and possible state employees being furloughed.
However, while it is a situation we must prepare for, it is unlikely.
Contingency plans are being made if we do
get to June 30 and a budget is not in place. We may be in a situation
where the budget and education funding plans get passed by the end of
the month, but we need to take a couple extra days in July to finish
other business such as the capital budget and Hirst.
The governor indicated yesterday he would
veto any temporary budget that would keep the government running for a
few extra days until lawmakers reach a deal. Nobody wants to see a
government shutdown and we want to do whatever is possible to make sure
that doesn’t happen.
Negotiations
The education funding negotiation
team continues to meet. Progress is being made, but given the extensive
amount of detail involved, it is a difficult process. I remain positive
that we will reach a solution for the education funding plan and the
operating budget by the end of the month.
As for taxes with the operating budget,
– I am hearing there are some still on the table – the internet sales
tax and possibly adjusting the real estate excise tax. As I stated in my
last update, I wouldn’t expect a capital gains state income tax or an
increase to the B&O tax, as much as the governor would like to see
one. I am still uncertain as to whether or not they have 50 votes for
tax increases in the House, and 25 votes for tax increases in the
Senate. We do not need to increase any taxes given the amount of revenue
coming into the state.
Revenue Forecast
The Economic Revenue Forecast Council released
their latest revenue forecast on Tuesday. The revenue forecast has
been increased by $81 million for the 2015-17 budget cycle and by $87
million for the 2017-19 budget cycle. The increases are smaller than the
increases in the March forecast, but they are still positive.
While this provides some additional
dollars that may be beneficial to budget negotiations, more dollars for
the budget is not necessary. A reminder, we are expecting more than a 13
percent increase in revenue – taxpayer dollars – this biennium. Revenue
is not the issue. I am concerned about what the level of proposed
spending may be in the final budget plan. However, we will talk about
that when the plan comes out.
I urge everyone to stay optimistic. From what I am seeing, a responsible, sustainable solution is within reach.
Sincerely,
Cary Condotta
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
What other people read on this blog
-
The State legislature must have a 2/3rds majority to raise taxes (I-1053). But hyperactive local government marches on. Lynnwood Council ...
-
The Freedom Foundation sponsored an event last Thursday in Vancouver, WA. A number of thugs showed up to disrupt the meeting. The disrupt...
-
Going into debt is bad news. Giving greedy Democrats the state's credit card is a very bad idea. State revenue is expected to be $778 mi...
-
In a television advertisement, Bill Gates Sr. came out in favor of Initiative 1098 -- the income tax initiative. Mr Gates is not as wealthy...
-
The Democratic Party and Patty Murray carry ads announcing "Dino [Rossi] supports keeping tax loopholes for corporations that send our ...
Effing the ineffable - Washington State elections sometimes have been rigged.
“It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”
-- Joseph Stalin
